Springfield – The Illinois Senate will return to the Houses of Parliament today to review a bill to review energy regulations that was drafted a few years ago but not finalized by Monday evening. The house will be back on Wednesday.
Some stakeholders, however, have pushed back aspects of the bill in another enthusiastic push ahead of each law deadline, with private discussions about one of JB Pritzker’s marquee campaign pledges. it goes on.
At the weekend, working groups met with state suppliers, green electricity groups, legislators and representatives of the governor’s office in order to coordinate the draft law drawn up by the governor’s office with the draft introduced in the Senate.
According to stakeholders in these working groups, the main beliefs of the law will remain the same for several months. Illinois will begin its 40% renewable energy journey by 2030 by increasing payer bills. Promote the adoption of electric vehicles through discounts and incentives. And make the state 100 percent carbon-free energy by 2050.
Some languages are still under negotiation, but the governor’s bill includes several subsidies funded by payers for nuclear power plants, renewable projects, the transition from coal to solar, etc.
This includes, but is not limited to:
– A $ 964 million subsidy for three nuclear power plants owned by energy giant Excelon, which costs about 80 cents of the average monthly bill.
– Added $ 1.22 to the average bill to fund new renewable energy development.
– 86 cents for an expanded low-income weathering program.
– About 18 cents a month to encourage the transition from closed or closed coal power plants to solar power plants.
– An additional 9 cents per month to convert a coal site into battery storage.
The payer’s average billing for estimation purposes is based on a monthly consumption of 650 kWh. This equates to a fee of about $ 90, depending on the region of the state.
The members of the working group are of the opinion that the amount of the subsidies and most of the provisions of the two 900-page bills have been clarified.
However, many measures are still being negotiated, including the planned closure of the coal-fired power plant in 2035, fairness measures in the renewable energy sector and the formulation that general wages must be paid for renewable projects. I’m going.
The completion date of the coal-fired power plant is an issue that will affect the draft law ahead of the ordinary legislative assembly’s postponement date on Dec.
The current version of the Governor’s Bill will force the facility to zero emissions by 2035 by lowering the emissions cap. Gas-fired power plants should be emission-free by 2045.
Working group members said the discussion would include discussions about what level of carbon sequestration would be acceptable to achieve the reduced carbon cap, such as: B. the capture of emissions and the underground burial.
Members of the Prairie State Energy Campus in Marissa and Springfield, Illinois, hydro, light and coal power plants have also postponed the 2035 date.
As posted, the governor’s proposal creates a task force to investigate quarantine and lending options for affected communities repaying public debts in prairie and power plants.
MEP Ann Williams, a member of the working group and longstanding proponent of renewable energy initiatives such as the Clean Energy Employment Act, said on a phone call Monday what she said as negotiations on isolated languages continued. We suspect that the quarantine method could prove to be 100% carbon free and call it a “temporary rather than permanent” solution.
All energy packages must be “strong climate-controlled legislation” aimed at reducing CO2 emissions.
“To be honest, at some point the coal-fired power plant still has to be closed,” she said. “We don’t want to continue mining coal. We want to use nuclear power as a bridge. And we want to get all renewable energies. And, in my opinion, the generation of electricity using fossil fuels. In conclusion, you don’t have to invest millions of dollars over the decades. “
Opponent writes Pritzker
52 MPs from both houses, including two Democrats each from the House of Representatives and the Senate, sent a letter to the governor over the weekend against a closure clause for coal-fired power plants.
The bill requires 36 votes in the Senate and 71 votes in the House of Representatives. The letter was signed by 18 of 59 state senators and 34 of 118 state representatives.
“The combination of these two factories employs more than 1,100 workers and allows an additional 1,000 skilled union clerks and women to get well-paying jobs,” he wrote. “If laws were passed in 2035 to shut down these facilities, catastrophic consequences would occur before their useful life expired.”
The letter also points to Illinois’ geological structure, which allows carbon emissions to be stored deep in subterranean formations.
A coalition of 20 business organizations also sent a letter Monday describing the language proposed to the governor as “the biggest rate hike in history for consumers and businesses.”
The letter covered the Illinois Chamber of Commerce, Illinois Manufacturers Association, Illinois Retailers Association, Illinois Municipal League, and more.
“Several times we asked for research on the effects on profitability, reliability and tariffs and the input of raw data to support this. These demands were ignored. These are breakthrough energy changes. Will disrupt the competitive energy market in Illinois, ”the organization wrote in a letter.
They conducted a full cost analysis and urged lawmakers and governors to postpone the bill so they could analyze the exact language of the final bill.
“At the very least, initial installments of increased costs for businesses and local governments are estimated at $ 700 million annually. Additional 215,500 to pay for new programs paid for by payers without their opinion. Includes $ 10,000, ”the group wrote in a letter.
Source link Energy bill has not yet been submitted within 24 hours of the scheduled vote | news